TLDR 7Jul25 ... (1) Apple Weighs Using Anthropic or OpenAI to Power Siri, (2) Amazon Is on Cusp of Using More Robots Than Humans, (3) Defeat of Ban on State A.I. Laws

Last update: Monday 7/7/25

Welcome to our 7Jul25 TL;DR summaries by ChatGPT of the past week's top 3 stories on our "Useful AI News" page ➡ (1) Apple Weighs Using Anthropic or OpenAI to Power Siri, (2) Amazon Is on the Cusp of Using More Robots Than Humans in Its Warehouses, and (3) Defeat of a 10-Year Ban on State A.I. Laws Is a Blow to Tech Industry

TL;DR ➡ HERE

ChatGPT's TL;DR summaries of Top 3 stories 

1. Apple | 2. Amazon | 3. Ban AI 

1) "Apple Weighs Using Anthropic or OpenAI to Power Siri in Major Reversal"
-- Mark Gurman, Bloomberg, 6/30/25  

-- This story also covered by Computerworld, Axios, 9to5Mac, TechCrunch

• Text Bloomberg
  
  

Apple Weighs Using Anthropic or OpenAI to Power Siri in Major Reversal

Apple is considering a dramatic shift in strategy by potentially replacing its in-house AI models with technology from Anthropic or OpenAI to power future versions of Siri. This would mark a major reversal from its long-standing commitment to developing proprietary AI infrastructure.

• Apple has requested cloud-based versions of Claude and ChatGPT for internal testing.

• The change would allow Apple to close the gap with AI-powered Android assistants.

This deliberation signals Apple’s internal recognition that its models lag behind those of leading AI companies. Siri development has suffered repeated delays, and executives now see outside models—especially Claude—as more capable.

• Anthropic is reportedly the frontrunner based on testing outcomes.

• Apple’s internal LLM Siri project remains active but has lost ground.

The shift has sparked internal tension and morale issues among Apple’s AI engineers. Some feel the exploration of third-party models reflects poorly on their work and could threaten their roles. At the same time, Meta and OpenAI are aggressively poaching talent with multimillion-dollar offers.

• Key researchers have already departed, including senior LLM lead Tom Gunter.

• Apple had to make counteroffers to prevent further defections.

BackToTop

Apple is testing whether it can run outside models on its Private Cloud Compute system to maintain user privacy. While in-house models will remain on-device for tasks like Genmojis and email summaries, cloud-based third-party models could soon handle complex Siri queries.

• Apple aims to keep sensitive AI inference within its own controlled infrastructure.

• Expanded third-party integration beyond Siri remains uncertain due to cloud limitations.

Internally, control over Siri and AI has shifted from AI chief John Giannandrea to Craig Federighi and Mike Rockwell. These leadership changes reflect a broader strategic pivot away from proprietary AI dominance toward a more flexible, partnership-based model.

• Rockwell led the Vision Pro effort and now oversees Siri development.

• Federighi has consolidated control over Apple’s software and AI-related platforms.

BackToTop

2) "Amazon Is on the Cusp of Using More Robots Than Humans in Its Warehouses"
-- Sebastian Herrera, WSJ, 6/30/25 

-- This story also covered by TechCrunch, Gizmodo, GeekWire, CNBC

• Text WSJ
• Text TechCrunch
  
  

Amazon deploys its 1 millionth robot, releases generative AI model

This is a combined summary from the TechCrunch and WSJ articles.

Amazon has now deployed more than one million robots across its global warehouse network, marking a major milestone in its 13-year automation journey. At some facilities, the number of robots is approaching parity with human workers. Approximately 75% of all Amazon deliveries are now assisted by robotics in some capacity.

• Amazon’s automation push is aimed at boosting productivity and efficiency.

• Robots are performing increasingly complex tasks such as sorting, picking, and packaging.

Amazon is rolling out new, AI-powered robotics systems including Vulcan, a dual-arm robot capable of sensing and gripping items with a simulated sense of touch. Additionally, the company introduced DeepFleet, a generative AI model that improves route coordination within warehouses by 10%.

• DeepFleet was developed using Amazon’s SageMaker and internal warehouse data.

• Vulcan’s tactile capabilities represent a step toward more autonomous, responsive robotics.

BackToTop

Automation is transforming Amazon’s labor model. Many repetitive manual jobs are being replaced by roles that involve supervising and maintaining robots. The company has retrained over 700,000 employees for higher-skilled roles like robotics technicians, with some workers earning 2.5 times their original pay.

• Average staffing per facility has decreased to its lowest in 16 years.

• Amazon promotes automation as a tool for job transformation, not just reduction.

Despite Amazon’s optimistic framing, there are growing concerns about long-term workforce impact. Labor advocates caution that advanced robotics and AI could significantly shrink headcounts, particularly in high-density fulfillment centers. Meanwhile, Amazon executives emphasize that robots are intended to support—not replace—humans.

• Some of Amazon’s new robotic centers already operate with minimal human staff.

• Warehouse labor groups are watching closely for signs of broader displacement.

BackToTop

3) "Defeat of a 10-Year Ban on State A.I. Laws Is a Blow to Tech Industry"
-- Cecilia Kang, NY Times, 7/1/25  

-- This story also covered by  Reuters, PBS, Washington Post, Politico,

• Text NY Times
• Text Washington Post
  
  

Defeat of a 10-Year Ban on State A.I. Laws Is a Blow to Tech Industry

This is a combined summary from the New York Times and Washington Post articles.

The U.S. Senate voted 99–1 to strike a proposed 10-year federal ban on state A.I. regulations, a major defeat for the tech industry and Republican leaders backing the moratorium. Initially introduced by Senator Ted Cruz and supported by Speaker Mike Johnson, the measure would have overridden existing and future state A.I. laws.

• The vote followed intense opposition from consumer advocates, state lawmakers, and child safety groups.

• All 50 states have introduced A.I. bills in the past year, and most already have A.I.-related laws in place.

A last-minute compromise between Senators Cruz and Blackburn to shorten the moratorium to five years collapsed after pushback over vague carveouts and potential risks to child protection laws. Blackburn ultimately led the charge to strip the provision, joining Democrats and most Republicans in voting it down.

• Critics said the compromise left unclear what protections would remain enforceable.

• Advocates feared the language would neuter laws against deepfakes and online harm.

BackToTop

The proposed moratorium had strong backing from tech giants and lobbying groups including OpenAI, Anduril, and Andreessen Horowitz, who argued that a patchwork of state regulations would stifle innovation. However, opponents argued it would create an unregulated space for Big Tech at the expense of public safety.

• Silicon Valley pushed for uniform national standards instead of varied state rules.

• Opponents countered that industry self-policing was not enough.

The fight mobilized a rare bipartisan coalition of critics, including labor unions, child advocates, state attorneys general, and even right-wing populists like Steve Bannon. Their campaign shifted momentum against the bill in the final hours, reflecting growing wariness of unchecked A.I. deployment.

• Over 250 state lawmakers from both parties signed a letter opposing the moratorium.

• The final vote sent a clear signal: state-level oversight of A.I. is here to stay.

BackToTop